Jasper Smit vs Martijn van Haasteren Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Smit 2 - 1 Haasteren
They have played 8 sets in total, with Smit winning 4 and Haasteren winning 4. The last match between Smit and Haasteren was at the Challenger Tunisie - Tunis, 05-11-2007, Q1 round, Hard with Jasper Smit getting the victory 3-6 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jasper Smit | 2 |
| Martijn van Haasteren | 1 |
Challenger Tunisie - Tunis(05-11-2007)
3
6
7
5
6
2
| Smit | Stats | Haasteren |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 413 | Highest Rank | 474 |
| 44 | Age | 44 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (123-107) | Career Total W/L | 46% (65-77) |
| $4,495 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 6-2 | |||||
| 7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 39 | Games Won | 41 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jasper Smit Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Steve Darcis
Player
Jasper Smit
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(8) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasper Smit
Player
Pablo Cuevas
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
19 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasper Smit
Player
Diego Junqueira
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Martijn van Haasteren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Slanar
Player
Martijn van Haasteren
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
84%
(
52 of
62)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-1 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (123/107) | Win/Loss | 46% (65/77) |
| 52% (276/253) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (2590/2447) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (41/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (23/19) |
| 50% (53/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (12/24) |
| 57% (27/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (30/30) |
| 40% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 21 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.01 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 19 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 433.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 57% (239/417) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (157/239) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (90/178) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (15/39) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (153/422) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 38% (5/8) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (58/54) | Challenger W/L | 43% (26/34) |
| 58% (60/44) | Futures W/L | 51% (36/35) |
| 53% (120/225) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (30/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (42/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 85% (117/100) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 15% (117/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 21% (113/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
